The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal.

You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes).

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 3 Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 compression artifacts in transverse low-dose chest CT images in 50-year-old man with ground-glass opacity nodule. Although lungs and chest wall and mediastinum were segmented in our experiment, unsegmented original image (top left) and Fig. S3A, which can be viewed from the information box in the upper right corner of the article at www.ajronline.org, and 10:1 compressed image (top right and Fig. S3B) are presented here and in Figures S3A and S3B to better depict regional difference in artifacts. Blurring artifacts are more prominent in chest wall than in lung. Note that this regional difference in perceptual artifacts is better reproduced by High–Dynamic Range Visual Difference Predictor (HDR-VDP) map (bottom right) than by mathematical subtraction image (bottom left). Region of interest for original and compressed images is smaller than that of subtraction image and HDR-VDP map. Arrow points to ground-glass opacity nodule.