AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROBINSON, T.
Right arrow Articles by CHANG, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ROBINSON, T.
Right arrow Articles by CHANG, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 103, 738-745, Copyright © 1968 by American Roentgen Ray Society


CLINICAL COMPARISON OF SCANS AND SCINTIPHOTOS OF THE THYROID GLAND

THEODORE ROBINSON M.D.1, CARL J. COLLICA 2, and SOON CHANG M.D.3

1 Department of Radiology, Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York
2 Chief, Radioisotope Laboratory, Fordham Hospital, Bronx, New York
3 Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, New York

One hundred consecutive thyroid rectilinear scans and scintiphotos were obtained. The two modalities of imaging were compared and evaluated.

The Gamma camera was found to produce superior images in a fraction of the time required for a rectilinear scanning.

The triple lens Polaroid camera produced images of extremes in density, thus amplifying defects and/or differences in uptake within the thyroid gland.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.