AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRÜNNER, S.
Right arrow Articles by MOSBECH, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BRÜNNER, S.
Right arrow Articles by MOSBECH, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 104, 598-602, Copyright © 1968 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ROENTGENOLOGIC AND GASTROCAMERA EXAMINATIONS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC ULCER

S. BRÜNNER 1, I. RAHBEK 2, and J. MOSBECH 2

1 From the Department of Roentgenology, St. Elisabeths Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 From the Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, and Department of Medicine, St. Elisabeths Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

In 102 patients with different diseases of the stomach, gastrocamera examination has been performed as a supplement to the roentgenologic examination. The results of the two methods are compared.

In 12 patients the examination with gastrocamera failed.

Out of 13 cases of gastric carcinoma, 7 were found by roentgenologic and 13 by gastrocamera examination.

Among 77 patients with nonmalignant diseases, roentgenologic examination gave suspicion of malignancy in 12 patients, whereas there were only 3 false positive cases by gastrocamera examination.

The over-all accuracy was 84 per cent by roentgenologic study, 87 per cent by gastrophotography, and 98 per cent by the combination of the two methods.

The combined technique of roentgenologic and gastrocamera examination seems to have improved the diagnosis of malignancy, but unfortunately only in the more advanced cases.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.