AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EDLAND, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by ANSFIELD, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by EDLAND, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by ANSFIELD, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

ADVANCED CANCER OF THE URINARY BLADDER

AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF RADIOTHERAPY ALONE vs. RADIOTHERAPY AND CONCOMITANT 5-FLUOROURACIL; A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY OF 36 CASES

R. W. EDLAND M.D., J. B. WEAR JR. M.D., and F. J. ANSFIELD M.D.

During the period March 1962 through December 1966, 36 patients were entered into a prospectively randomized study to evaluate the effects of concomitant 5-FU therapy upon the radical supervoltage radiotherapy of advanced invasive carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Despite the almost uniform transient increase in acute morbidity with the combined therapy technique employed in this study, no significant increase in long-term morbidity was encountered over those patients receiving only radical supervoltage radiotherapy.

This certainly would be an acceptable price to pay if indeed survival figures were enhanced by these techniques. However, despite the apparent reduction in demonstrable distant metastases utilizing the techniques of drug administration previously outlined, the results of this study, while fully comparable with other surgical series, although preserving bladder function, do not indicate any significant improvement in over-all patient survival when concomitant 5-FU is added to full-dose radical supervoltage radiotherapy in the management of patients with deeply invasive carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

It may well be, as the preliminary reports of Kaufman and Stein12,16 tend to indicate, that the best use of 5-FU and supervoltage radiotherapy as a combined approach would be as pre-planned, midrange preoperative treatment. This would take into account both the high incidence of local treatment failures with either treatment regimen randomized in this present study as well as the apparent reduction of demonstrable distant metastases in the group receiving combined therapy. Hopefully, a prospectively randomized study can be devised to properly evaluate this approach.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.