AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STRAX, P.
Right arrow Articles by SHAPIRO, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by STRAX, P.
Right arrow Articles by SHAPIRO, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHY IN REDUCTION OF MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER IN MASS SCREENING

PHILIP STRAX M.D.1, LOUIS VENET M.D.2, and SAM SHAPIRO B.S.3

1 Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, New York Medical College; and Director of Radiology, La Guardia Hospital, New York.
2 Director of Surgery, Jewish Memorial Hospital, New York; and Associate Clinical Professor of Surgery, New York Medical College, New York.
3 Director of Research and Statistics, Health Insurance Plan.

A randomized mass screening program using mammography as well as clinical examination in women aged 40 to 64 years resulted in a higher proportion of breast cancer detected with no axillary lymph node involvement and subsequently a substantial reduction in mortality in a study group as compared to a matched control. Both clinical examination and mammography contributed independently to the yield. However, in women under 50 in this study, mammography led to detection of only a small proportion of additional cases, while at age 50 years and over omission of either modality would have led to substantially lower cancer detection rates. The particularly substantial contribution of mammography is underscored by a case fatality rate of only 2 per cent in cancers detected in mammography alone.

It would be reasonable to conclude that further follow-up to determine long-term effect of the screening procedures is indicated.

It would also seem useful to evaluate the contribution of newer improved methods of mammography and introduction of other modalities such as thermography in improving results in women under 50 years of age.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. A. Sickles
Wolfe Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 301 - 303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. A. Sickles
Breast Imaging: From 1965 to the Present
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.