AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by DÁVILA, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by DÁVILA, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

RELIABILITY OF SKELETAL AGE ASSESSMENTS

G. FRANK JOHNSON M.D.1, JOHN P. DORST M.D.2, JERALD P. KUHN M.D.3, ALEX F. ROCHE M.D.4, and GAIL H. DÁVILA B.A.5

1 Director of Radiology, Dayton Children’s Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio.
2 Pediatric Radiologist, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
3 Head, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Buffalo, New York.
4 Head, Physica1 Growth and Genetics Section, The Fels Research Institute, Yellow Springs, Ohio.
5 Research Associate, The Fels Research Institute, Yellow Springs, Ohio.

An analysis has been made of repeated skeletal age assessments of 50 hand-wrist roentgenograms by 5 observers. These assessments by pediatric radiologists and research workers were made using the tables of Garn and his co-workers5 for younger patients and the Greulich and Pyle atlas for older patients.

The replicability of assessments by the pediatric radiologists and the research workers, when using the Greulich and Pyle atlas, was similar to that reported by other experienced assessors and was better at younger than at older ages. The differences between observers were larger for pairs including pediatric radiologists than for the pair of research workers. These differences tended to be smaller when the method of Garn et al.5 was used.

The differences between repeated assessments by the research workers were smaller when the Greulich and Pyle atlas was used to make bone-specific assessments than when it was used to make over-all assessments. Data from patients in whom the differences between observers were large indicate that the range of maturity levels within a hand-wrist area influences reliability with the over-all Greulich and Pyle method, but not the bone-specific Greulich and Pyle method. Furthermore, assessments by the over-all method tended to be about 2 months in advance of those made by the bone-specific method. In the younger patients, there were no important mean differences between the levels assigned depending on the method used. When using the Greulich and Pyle atlas, there was a slight tendency for the pediatric radiologists to assign more advanced skeletal ages than the research workers, and this tendency was more marked in older patients.

Each assessor should know his approximate reliability; the way in which this can be determined is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Berst, L. Dolan, M. M. Bogdanowicz, M. A. Stevens, S. Chow, and E. A. Brandser
Effect of Knowledge of Chronologic Age on the Variability of Pediatric Bone Age Determined Using the Greulich and Pyle Standards
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 507 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.