AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOEFFLER, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LOEFFLER, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

INFLUENCE OF FRACTIONATION ON ACUTE AND LATE REACTIONS IN VOCAL CORD CARCINOMA

R. KENNETH LOEFFLER M.D.

Four schedules for the treatment of localized vocal cord carcinoma were compared, to establish a relationship between daily and total dose, and acute and late normal tissue reactions. All patients were treated 5 days per week.

All of those who received 200 R daily (6,000 R in 30 treatments) developed a confluent mucositis and minimal to moderate subsequent aryepiglottic edema.

Patients who received 180 R daily (6,480 R in 36 treatments) developed a patchy mucositis.

Those who received 170 R daily (7,140 R or 6,400 rads in 42 treatments) developed only a brisk erythema, with decreasing incidence and severity of edema.

At 160 R daily (6,880 R in 43 treatments) only a mild erythema developed, with no visible edema at any time.

Local recurrence rates of about 10 per cent for T1 lesions, and of about 25 per cent for T2 and T3 lesions, indicate that the decrease in reactions with longer fractionation has been achieved without loss of tumor control. Even minimal improvement in functional status following treatment for this highly curable malignancy well justifies the inconvenience of the increased number of treatments.

The present formula of Ellis for normal tissue tolerance is not consistent with these findings, since the NSDs are essentially identical for all 4 schedules, while tolerance is notably improved by increasing fractionation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.