AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PECK, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by PFISTER, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PECK, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by PFISTER, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

TOMOGRAPHY OF PELVIC-ABDOMINAL MASSES DURING INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY

AN ADDED DIMENSION

ANTHONY G. PECK M.D.1, ISABEL C. YODER M.D., and RICHARD C. PFISTER M.D.

1 University Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Experience with a wide variety of pelvic-abdominal masses indicates that good quality tomography during high dose urography permits separation of solid from cystic lesions in almost all cases, even with minimal mass opacification. Evaluation of surface contour, absence or presence of a wall and its features, opacification, calcification, and uterine status provides the framework for characterization of the mass. Multiple masses can be identified and evaluated separately. While titration of the above criteria permits an accurate assessment independent of the clinical diagnosis, the latter information is important in separating a probable abscess from other cystic lesions.

Since urography continues to be a pivotal preoperative roentgenologic investigation (ureteral status, pelvic kidney exclusion, etc.), the addition of tomography provides an added dimension to its usefulness. With the exception of the premenopausal female in whom radiation exposure is a consideration, tomography appears to preclude the routine necessity for subsequent ultrasound study which has been used to separate cystic from solid lesions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.