AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KALISHER, L.
Right arrow Articles by PEYSTER, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KALISHER, L.
Right arrow Articles by PEYSTER, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

XEROGRAPHIC MANIFESTATIONS OF MALE BREAST DISEASE

LESTER KALISHER M.D. and ROBERT G. PEYSTER M.D.

Male breast disease, although overshadowed by its female counterpart, is still a problem which often comes to the attention of the radiologist. The major importance of mammography is differentiating unilateral gynecomastia from cancer. We now recognize four xeroradiographic patterns of gynecomastia: (1) increased ducts only; (2) ductal hyperplasia mimicking adenosis; (3) small ducts with stromal proliferation; and (4) fatty replacement only. These reflect the duration of the process.

Gynecomastic masses are central, smooth, and most important, extend from the nipple outward, usually bisecting the midplane. Ducts may be visible. Carcinoma is usually central, dense, with irregular spiculated margins and, unlike gynecomastia is rarely in the midplane of the nipple, although it can be retroareolar in location. There may be concomitant skin changes or lymphadenopathy seen on the xerogram and these never occur in gynecomastia.

There are numerous etiologies for gynecomastia, and these have been discussed in detail. It is thought that the radiologist should be aware of the pathophysiology of male breast disease and understand its significance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.