AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krishnamurthy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Blahd, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krishnamurthy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Blahd, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 126, Issue 2, 293-301
Copyright © 1976 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Pharmaco-kinetics of current skeletal-seeking radiopharmaceuticals

GT Krishnamurthy, RJ Huebotter, M Tubis, and WH Blahd

The blood clearance of all current bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals is biexponential during the first four hours after injection. Exponent I represents bone uptake and its clearance half-time is less than 30 min. Exponent II represents mainly urinary excretion and its clearance half-time varies from 168 to 512 min. The blood background is highest with 99mTc-labeled polyphosphate (Tc-Poly) and lowest with sodium fluoride (F-18); 99mTc-labeled diphosphonate (Tc-Dip) and 99mTc-labeled pyrophosphate (Tc-Pyro) show intermediate blood levels. The slower blood clearance of 99mTc-phosphate complexes in comparison with F-18 is due primarily to their increased protein binding. Tc-Poly blood clearance, which is slower than that of Tc-Dip and Tc-Pyro, is due primarily to its increased red cell binding and the larger size of its molecule. Bone uptake and urinary excretion of all 99mTc-labeled phosphate complexes are approximately the same: in the range of six to ten per cent in the blood, 30-33% in the urine, and 55-58 percent in the bone and other tissues. F-18 concentration in the bone is almost 1.5 times that of the 99mTc-labeled phosphate complexes. The sensitivity and resolution of lesions are identical for all 99mTc-labeled phosphate complexes and are far better than those for F-18. No toxicity is noted with the amount of phosphate present in the marketed kits, and it appears reasonable to use the minimal amount so long as efficiency is not compromised.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.