AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onoyama, Y
Right arrow Articles by Nishidai, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Onoyama, Y
Right arrow Articles by Nishidai, T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 126, Issue 3, 481-492
Copyright © 1976 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Radiation therapy in the treatment of glioblastoma

Y Onoyama, M Abe, E Yabumoto, T Sakamoto, and T Nishidai

A retrospective study of 127 cases irradiated for glioblastoma was made to assess the role of radiation therapy and to determine the optimal technique of radiation therapy. The over-all survival rates of our series were 52 percent at one year, 19 percent at three years, and twelve percent at five years after radiation therapy. Survival time of the patients is influenced by various factors other than treatment: age, sex, histologic grading, duration of symptoms, and location of tumor. Among these factors, the location of the tumor was the most important in our present series. Surgical treatment can extend the survival time. More extensive resection results in longer survival, provided that the location of the tumor allows such a surgical procedure. Radiation therapy can prolong the survival time of those with glioblastoma, but a high tumor dose of more than 6,000 rads or 1,700 rets is necessary to improve the prognosis significantly. Therefore, irradiation should be administered through generous fields according to the extent of the tumor under precise planning to determine the accurate localization and extent of the tumor.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. N. Sarkaria, B. L. Carlson, M. A. Schroeder, P. Grogan, P. D. Brown, C. Giannini, K. V. Ballman, G. J. Kitange, A. Guha, A. Pandita, et al.
Use of an orthotopic xenograft model for assessing the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification on glioblastoma radiation response.
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7 Pt 1): 2264 - 2271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Martuza, A Malick, J. Markert, K. Ruffner, and D. Coen
Experimental therapy of human glioma by means of a genetically engineered virus mutant
Science, May 10, 1991; 252(5007): 854 - 856.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.