|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Some limitations that impair the picture quality of computed tomography are presented. Picture grain is analyzed in detail and its relationship to different matrix sizes is demonstrated. The choices of matrix size for viewing various parts of the body are defined, and the need for higher resolution in the future is debated. Comparison is made between two scanning systems: the moving fan beam with rotation and the simple rotating fan beam. Possible artifacts in the picture caused by drift and delay in dector response are discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. L. Berland Commentary on "Computed Tomography of the Body: Initial Clinical Trial with the EMI Prototype" and "Computed Tomography of the Body: Early Trends in Application and Accuracy of the Method" Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 16 - 18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Goldman Principles of CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2007; 35(4): 213 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |