AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, K
Right arrow Articles by Rowan, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, K
Right arrow Articles by Rowan, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 127, Issue 3, 429-431
Copyright © 1976 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Electrical stimulation for anal sphincter control in barium enema examinations: an extended trial

K Clark and D Rowan

The routine use in 500 consecutive patients of a barium enema cannula incorporating stimulating electrodes is described. Barium retention was improved by the electrically maintained contraction of the anal sphincter. The cannula was connected to a battery-powered control unit which provided the stimulus; pulse width was 1 msec and frequency was 20 pulses/sec. The pulse amplitude, adjusted for each patient, was in the range of 5--17V. A standard procedure was adopted throughout the trial without the use of colonic relaxants (such as anticholinergic drugs). The barium suspension and water were in stilled at body temperature. A comparison with a control series of 200 patients showed a significant reduction in the failure rate from 20% to 4%. No unpleasant side effects were encountered apart from a tingling sensation in the anal region which was expected. The principal factors contributing to failure were fecal impaction and diverticular disease.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.