AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 127, Issue 6, 915-921
Copyright © 1976 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Gastrointestinal perforation without intraperitoneal air-fluid level in neonatal pneumoperitoneum

RA Kaufman, LR Kuhns, AK Poznanski, and JF Holt

Twenty-one cases of neonatal pneumoperitoneum seen at the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital between 1970 and 1974 were reviewed. Of 14 cases with autopsy or surgically proven gastrointestinal perforation, six did not have an intraperitoneal air-fluid level on the initial cross-table lateral roentgenogram while eight did. Four cases of pneumoperitoneum secondary to mechanically assisted ventilation and air leak phenomenon had no air-fluid level. A postmortem study in one premature infant cadaver suggests that the air-fluid level may not be reliably demonstrated when the amount of intraperitoneal fluid is small. These data support the contention that an intraperitoneal air-fluid level does not uniformly occur in perforated viscus and that its absence, even in the presence of mechanically assisted ventilation, does not exclude the necessity for surgical intervention. In some cases, water-soluble contrast examination of the gastrointestinal tract appears to be a more reliable diagnostic adjunct to document a perforated viscus, when a definite intraperitoneal air-fluid level is not present.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.