AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chikos, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chikos, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 128, Issue 3, 367-373
Copyright © 1977 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Correlation between chest film and angiographic assessment of left ventricular size

PM Chikos, MM Figley, and L Fisher

In 76 adult males quantitative angiographic measurements of left ventricular size were compared to 12 plain chest film measurements of heart size and shape. Of the 18 normal cases, only Rigler's B measurement correlated with left ventricular volume (r = .64). However, this correlation was not statistically significant. Of the 58 patients with isolated aortic valve disease, 19 had increased left ventricular mass (hypertrophy) and 39 had both increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume and mass (hypertrophy and dilatation). In the hypertrophy group, plain film heart volume was the most sensitive detector of an enlarged left ventricle (21% false negative rate) and correlated with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = .62). Using stepwise discriminant analysis, the combination of heart volume, leftness of the heart, apex position, and roundness of the left ventricle decreased the false negative rate to 5%. In the hypertrophy and dilatation group, plain film heart volume had the highest correlation with left ventricular volume and mass (r = .66) and a false negative rate of 8%. No single variable or combination of variables could usefully discriminate between the hypertrophy and hypertrophy and dilatation groups. These data support the conclusion that plain film heart volume is the best single measurement for detecting left ventricular enlargement.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. F. Philbin, R. Garg, K. Danisa, D. M. Denny, G. Gosselin, C. Hassapoyannes, A. Horney, D. E. Johnstone, R. M. Lang, K. Ramanathan, et al.
The Relationship Between Cardiothoracic Ratio and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Congestive Heart Failure
Arch Intern Med, March 9, 1998; 158(5): 501 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.