AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chikos, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chikos, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 128, Issue 3, 375-380
Copyright © 1977 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Visual assessment of total heart volume and specific chamber size from standard chest radiographs

PM Chikos, MM Figley, and L Fisher

Ten radiologists at three levels of training visually assessed total heart and individual chamber size in 95 adults of both sexes with well defined cardiac diagnoses. Overall accuracy was highest for total heart size (82.2% correct), followed by left ventricular size, left atrial size and right heart size 79.6%, 75.0%, and 72.8%, respectively. Right heart and left atrial enlargement had a statistically significant negative effect on visual assessment of other chambers (P less than .05). Attempts to subclassify left ventricular enlargement into hypertrophy and hypertrophy and dilatation groups proved unsuccessful. While 63% of the hypertrophy group was detected as abnormal, only 24.3% were correctly subclassified as hypertrophy. For the hypertrophy and dilatation group, the corresponding values were 82% and 70%, respectively. Oblique views were useful in assessing left ventricular size only when inexperienced observers were included in the group of evaluators (P less than .05). A statistically significant improvement in assessment of normal left ventricular size and overall left atrial size was noted with experience (P less than .01 and P less than .05, respectively).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.