AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Stokely, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Stokely, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 128, Issue 5, 789-793
Copyright © 1977 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Effect of kilovoltage on detectability of pulmonary nodules in a chest phantom

EE Christensen, GW Dietz, RC Murry, JG Moore, and EM Stokely

A partial chest phantom was constructed to examine the effect of kilovoltage on the detectability of pulmonary nodules. Four different energies were studied: 100, 150, 200, and 300 kVp. Nodule detectability improved with increasing energies up to 200 kVp, but improvement was relatively small and was accompanied by an almost equal rise in the number of false positive readings. Patient exposures were least at 200 kVp. There seems to be no advantage in a 300 kVp technique, since nodule detectability decreased and patient exposures increased at this energy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Uffmann, U. Neitzel, M. Prokop, N. Kabalan, M. Weber, C. J. Herold, and C. Schaefer-Prokop
Flat-Panel-Detector Chest Radiography: Effect of Tube Voltage on Image Quality
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 642 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.