AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Isherwood, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Callen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Isherwood, I
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 129, Issue 5, 907-910
Copyright © 1977 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Computed tomographic evaluation of the retrocrural prevertebral space

PW Callen, M Korobkin, and I Isherwood

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans of 151 patients were reviewed for the presence of discrete structures between the vertebra and the diaphragmatic crura. A distinct retrocrural structure larger than 6 mm in diameter was present in 39 patients. In 112 patients the retrocrural space contained discrete structures smaller than 6 mm or showed no definable structures. Of the 39 patients with retrocrural structures larger than 6 mm in diameter, 37 had clinical and other CT evidence as well as biopsy or lymphangiographic evidence of middle to upper abdominal paraaortic adenopathy. Only three of the 112 patients exhibiting retrocrural structures smaller than 6 mm had such evidence of associated retroperitoneal adenopathy. These three were found to have enlarged nodes, but in the lower rather than the middle or upper abdomen. It is concluded that discrete retrocrural structures larger than 6 mm represent enlarged lymph nodes. Smaller retrocrural structures represent azygous veins or normal lymphatic structures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Lucey, J. W. Stuhlfaut, and J. A. Soto
Mesenteric Lymph Nodes: Detection and Significance on MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 41 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.