AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pizzolato, N.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pizzolato, N.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 130, Issue 5, 845-847
Copyright © 1978 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

A new contrast agent for oral cholecystography: iopronic acid (Oravue)

NF Pizzolato, JP Arcomano, and AE Baum

In a preliminary study to determine the safety and minimal effective dose in patients with impaired hepatic function, the cholecystographic agent iopronic acid (Oravue, research contrast material from Squibb) was well tolerated in single oral doses of 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 g. None of the patients experienced clinical adverse reactions. The radiologic results were generally poor, as anticipated for patients with total serum bilirubin concentrations of 2.0-11.4 mg/100 ml. In a subsequent double-blind controlled study in patients without hapatic dysfunction, 4.5 g of iopronic acid or 3.0 g of iopanoic acid (Telepaque, Winthrop) was given to two groups of 90 patients each. Serial radiographs were obtained 13, 14, 15, and 16 hr after ingestion of the drug. Both drugs were highly effective cholecystographic agents, producing visualization in 88% of the patients. Although not statistically significant, a repeat dose was required for visualization in only 4% of the patients given iopronic acid compared to 9% of the patients given iopanoic acid. Visualization was nearly always observed on the first film obtained 13 hr after drug administration. The contrast agents were similar in terms of safety.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.