American College of Radiology Diagnostic Efficacy Studies

Questions about costs and benefits of radiologic diagnostic methods have lead to the formation of a standing American College of Radiology Committee on Efficacy. In the past several years this committee has defined a hierarchy of efficacies associated with radiographic procedures and developed methods for assigning a numerical value to diagnostic efficacy. A national study of common x-ray examinations in the emergency setting has been conducted. These studies suggest that diagnostic thinking of clinicians was influenced by the results of the x-ray procedures they requested in more than 92% of cases. Medicolegal consideration were a prime concern of the clinician only 6% of the time overall when selecting the most frequent radiologic procedures conducted in hospitals. Considerable uncertainty about clinical diagnoses was typically present at the time radiologic examinations were requested; three-fourths of the time the most important diagnosis under consideration was judged to be less likely after x-ray examination than before. About one-eighth of the time the radiographic information focused attention on a new "most important" diagnosis. The committee plans further studies to include other imaging modalities and practive settings.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Hendrikse, J. W. C. Gratama, W. ten Hove, J. H. Rommes, M. J. Schultz, and P. E. Spronk Low Value of Routine Chest Radiographs in a Mixed Medical-Surgical ICU Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 823 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]