AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Loop, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Loop, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 131, Issue 1, 35-40
Copyright © 1978 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Computed tomography in patients with cerebrovascular disease: impact of a new technology on patient care

EB Larson, GS Omenn, and JW Loop

The medical care of 157 patients with suspected cerebrovascular disease was analyzed to assess the impact of the new technology, computed tomography (CT) of the brain, on the care of these patients. A cohort of patients admitted before installation of CT was compared to two cohorts admitted after installation of CT. Length of hospital stay, speed of diagnostic workup, treatment, and discharge plans were not significantly different. Discharge diagnoses were more specific after installation of CT. Lumbar punctures and radionuclide brain scans were used less frequently, but utilization of other diagnostic studies was unchanged. Aggregate charges for diagnostic procedures actually increased in both after-CT groups. In this study, addition of CT to the neurodiagnostic armamentarium resulted in little demonstrable improvement in the care of these patients with cerebrovascular disease but did increase the cost of evaluation. This is unlike the situation for patients with brain tumors, where CT was shown to improve care while not increasing cost. These results may help guide the use of CT by physicians caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease and suggest that health planners not use all patients with cerebrovascular disease in estimating need for CT.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. M. Wardlaw, J. Seymour, J. Cairns, S. Keir, S. Lewis, and P. Sandercock
Immediate Computed Tomography Scanning of Acute Stroke Is Cost-Effective and Improves Quality of Life
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2477 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. A. A. Evers, A. J. H. A. Ament, and G. Blaauw
Economic Evaluation in Stroke Research : A Systematic Review
Stroke, May 1, 2000; 31(5): 1046 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.