AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittenberg, J
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wittenberg, J
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 131, Issue 1, 5-14
Copyright © 1978 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Clinical efficacy of computed body tomography

J Wittenberg, HV Fineberg, EB Black, RH Kirkpatrick, DL Schaffer, MK Ikeda, and JT Ferrucci Jr

A method for assessing the effect of computed body tomography on diagnostic understanding and therapeutic decision making is described and the results in the first 184 patients are presented. The patients' referring physicians provided the primary data used for the evaluation. CT improved diagnostic understanding in 41% of patients, reassured the physician about previously planned therapy in 43%, contributed to a change in therapy in 17%, and improved precision of previously planned treatment in an additional 10%. CT contributed to a decision not to perform surgery in 21% of patients in whom an operation had been provisionally planned While CT can play an important role in patient management, its measured value depends on the clinical problems investigated and the level of efficacy on which it is judged.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
B. E. Hillner, B. A. Siegel, D. Liu, A. F. Shields, I. F. Gareen, L. Hanna, S. H. Stine, and R. E. Coleman
Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Alone on Expected Management of Patients With Cancer: Initial Results From the National Oncologic PET Registry
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 26(13): 2155 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, U. Siebert, and M. T. Beinfeld
Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the Assessment of Diagnostic Imaging Technologies
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 361 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
G J Herder, H van Tinteren, E F Comans, O S Hoekstra, G J Teule, P E Postmus, U Joshi, and E F Smit
Prospective use of serial questionnaires to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in suspected lung cancer
Thorax, January 1, 2003; 58(1): 47 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. C. Gillan, F. J. Gilbert, J. E. Andrew, A. M. Grant, D. Wardlaw, N. W. Valentine, A. C. Gregori, and For the Scottish Back Trial Group
Influence of Imaging on Clinical Decision Making in the Treatment of Lower Back Pain
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 393 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. G. Fryback and J. R. Thornbury
The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1991; 11(2): 88 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.