AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeSmet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thornbury,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeSmet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thornbury, , JR
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 132, Issue 1, 95-99
Copyright © 1979 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

A second look at the utility of radiographic skull examination for trauma

AA DeSmet, DG Fryback, and Thornbury JR

A prospective study tested the hypothesis of Bell and Loop (1971) that 21 high yield findings are significantly associated with the presence of a skull fracture and can be used to decide which patients need skull radiography. In our study, 17 fractures were detected in 594 patients who had skull radiography because of trauma to the head. Six of these fractures occurred in children who had none of the 21 Bell and Loop high yield findings. These six patients were asymptomatic except for superficial injury at the site of trauma. Had the Bell and Loop criteria been used to decide which patients had skull radiography, 35% (all in children) of the fractures would have gone undetected. Thus, in our study population, the Bell and Loop high yield findings were not satisfactory criteria for the decision about obtaining skull films in children.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Bobbio, R. Detrano, A. H. Shandling, M. H. Ellestad, J. Clark, O. Brezden, A. Abecia, and D. Martinez-Caro
Clinical Assessment of the Probability of Coronary Artery Disease: Judgmental Bias from Personal Knowledge
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1992; 12(3): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
R. M. Poses and M. Anthony
Availability, Wishful Thinking, and Physicians' Diagnostic Judgments for Patients with Suspected Bacteremia
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 159 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. Politser
Decision Analysis and Clinical Judgment: A Re-evaluation
Med Decis Making, January 1, 1981; 1(4): 361 - 389.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.