AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dodds, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dodds, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 132, Issue 2, 197-200
Copyright © 1979 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Predictability of rectal incontinence on barium enema examination

ET Stewart and WJ Dodds

The aim of this study was to determine if digital assessment of anal sphincter tone predicts whether a rectal balloon is needed to prevent incontinence during a barium enema examination. During an 8 month , 306 patients scheduled for barium enema examination were evaluated. Immediately before each examination as good, fair, or poor. The barium enema was then performed in a conventional manner. Leakage of even small amounts of barium was scored as rectal incontinence. Ability to retain the barium enema correlated closely with the strength of rectal bone, regardless of patient sex or age. For different sphincter tones the incidence of rectal incontinence was: good, 2%, fair, 30%; and poor, 90%. From these findings it is recommended that, irrespective of patient age and sex, the use of rectal balloon catheters be limited to patients with poor or fair rectal tone.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
A. Ganeshan, S. Upponi, R. Uberoi, H. D'Costa, C. Picking, and H. Bungay
Minimal-preparation CT colon in detection of colonic cancer, the Oxford experience
Age Ageing, January 1, 2007; 36(1): 48 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Low, A. K. Shenoy, A. R. Gilmour, S. M. Stewart, and A. C. Downie
A randomized comparison of retention balloon and standard tip rectal catheters in preventing incontinence during double-contrast barium enema.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 702 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.