AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLachlan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sackett, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLachlan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sackett, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 132, Issue 2, 227-229
Copyright © 1979 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Observer variation in the interpretation of lower limb venograms

MS McLachlan, JG Thomson, DW Taylor, ME Kelly, and DL Sackett

After agreeing on diagnostic criteria and after a pilot study, two experienced radiologists twice independently reviewed 40 lower limb venograms performed by a standard technique in patients suspected or known to have venous thrombosis. The observers reviewed 20 examinations at a time, their analysis requiring separate identification of 11 major veins. At each site observers stated whether thrombus was "absent," "doubtful," "presumed," or "definite," or declared "no opinion possible." They then rediscussed criteria of diagnosis and, using the same experimental design, examined another 40 venograms. To correct for agreement expected by chance, data were analyzed by using the kappa statistic. In general, levels of agreement were higher than those reported for many other clinical and radiologic investigations, probably because of refinement of criteria after the pilot study. Nonetheless, observers disagreed about the probable presence or absence of thrombus at some site in the limb in about 10% of examinations. Observer variation should be considered when venography is used as a reference standard to evaluate other methods of diagnosing thrombi.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Kalva, J. P. Jagannathan, P. F. Hahn, and S. T. Wicky
Venous Thromboembolism: Indirect CT Venography during CT Pulmonary Angiography--Should the Pelvis Be Imaged?
Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 605 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
H.-J. Baarslag, E. J.R. van Beek, M. M.W. Koopman, and J. A. Reekers
Prospective Study of Color Duplex Ultrasonography Compared with Contrast Venography in Patients Suspected of Having Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities
Ann Intern Med, June 18, 2002; 136(12): 865 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. G.W. Fraser, A. R. Moody, P. S. Morgan, A. L. Martel, and I. Davidson
Diagnosis of Lower-Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Prospective Blinded Study of Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging
Ann Intern Med, January 15, 2002; 136(2): 89 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. E. Spritzer, M. A. Arata, and K. S. Freed
Isolated Pelvic Deep Venous Thrombosis: Relative Frequency as Detected with MR Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. M. Duwe, M. Shiau, N. E. Budorick, J. H. M. Austin, and Y. M. Berkmen
Evaluation of the Lower Extremity Veins in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Comparison of Helical CT Venography and Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1525 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Ruehm, W. Wiesner, and J. F. Debatin
Pelvic and Lower Extremity Veins: Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venography with a Dedicated Vascular Coil-Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 421 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. Kalodiki and A. N. Nicolaides
Air Plethysmography for the Detection of Acute DVT: New Criteria
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 1997; 31(2): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Cogo, P. Prandoni, S. Villalta, P. Polistena, E. Bernardi, P. Simioni, M. Vigo, L. Benedetti, and A. Girolami
Changing Features of Proximal Vein Thrombosis Over Time
Angiology, May 1, 1994; 45(5): 377 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.