AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roub, L.
Right arrow Articles by Drayer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roub, L.
Right arrow Articles by Drayer, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 133, Issue 2, 267-273
Copyright © 1979 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Spinal computed tomography: limitations and applications

LW Roub and BP Drayer

A comprehensive review of 188 spinal computed tomography (CT) scans done over a 9-month period was performed to establish both the shortcomings and applications of the technique. The value of intrathecal enhancement was reviewed in an attempt to establish indications for its use. The data base comprised 51 abnormal scans including cases of spinal trauma, dysraphism, intra- and extraspinal neoplasm, and spinal stenosis. Results indicate that: (1) the introduction of intrathecal contrast media greatly extends the morphologic capabilities of spinal CT in practically all cases where altered anatomy of the spinal canal and its contents is suspected; (2) conventional screening procedures such as plain films of the spine and myelography should be obtained prior to spinal CT in most cases because of their value in defining the location and longitudinal extent of the pathologic process; (3) spinal CT examinations tailored to specific areas of interest result in better characterization of traumatic, dysraphic, and stenotic conditions conceivably leading to better surgical management and more accurate prognosis. At present, spinal CT has its greatest diagnostic usefulness in the evaluation of trauma and its sequela.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Wintermark, E. Mouhsine, N. Theumann, P. Mordasini, G. van Melle, P. F. Leyvraz, and P. Schnyder
Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures in Patients Who Have Sustained Severe Trauma: Depiction with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 681 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.