AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurohara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morrow, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurohara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morrow, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 133, Issue 2, 293-297
Copyright © 1979 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Uterine cervical cancer: treatment with megavoltage radiation results and afterloading intracavitary techniques

SS Kurohara, P Di Saia, J Kurohara, I Grossman, FW George 3rd, and CP Morrow

Results were evaluated for 651 consecutive patients with invasive cancer of the intact uterine cervix. From 1963 through 1967 319 patients were treated primarily with the older Los Angeles County Hospital system of orthovoltage radiation and intracavitary radium therapy. Thereafter, 1968--1974, 332 patients were treated primarily with a newer modified M. D. Anderson Tumor Institute system of megavoltage radiation and afterloading intracavitary radium therapy. Age distribution and histology were similar for both groups, but clinical stage was slightly more advanced for patients treated earlier. Crude and net 5 year survival rates were 36% and 49% for the early group and 54% and 67% for the later group. Net 5 year survival rates for the earlier group by stage were: stage I, 74%; II, 62%; III, 23%; and IV, 6%. Survival rates for the later group were: I, 81%; II 76%; III, 50%; and IV, 15%. We believe this improvement can be attributed to more effective intracavitary radium therapy for handling local cancer and to delivery of cancericidal doses of radiation to regional nodes with the megavoltage radiation apparatus, as well as to the greater cooperative efforts put forth in the management of County Hospital patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.