AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irish, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meaney, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irish, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meaney, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 134, Issue 1, 137-140
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles

CR Irish and TF Meaney

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography has become a well accepted and safe method of examining the biliary system. Recent reports emphasize the use of thin-guage Chiba needle, citing increased safety and accuracy, while others express preference for the larger sheathed needle for therapeutic drainage. A total of 80 procedures in 72 patients was reviewed to determine success rates relative to needle size in dilated or nondilated ducts. With a dilated biliary system, procedures using the large needle were successful in 92% (24/26) of the procedures versus 80.8% (21/26) using the Chiba needle; the differences were not statistically significant. Chiba needle studies were successful in 41.7% (10/24) of patients with nondilated ducts. The number of studies of nondilated ducts with the large needle was small and not statistically significant. Complication rates were comparable. Recommendations are made for needle choice in various patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.