AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masters, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masters, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 3, 539-547
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Evaluation of head trauma: efficacy of skull films

SJ Masters

A retrospective review of 1,845 patients was performed to evaluate the efficacy of skull films in acute head trauma. The implications of efficacy included effects on diagnosis, therapy, and ultimate outcome. Seventy-nine patients had skull fractures. Thirty-three patients sustained significant intracranial sequelae from their injuries, but only seven of these also sustained fractures. Twenty-six patients had significant intracranial sequelae but no skull fracture. In none of the 33 patients with significant intracranial sequelae was management or outcome affected by skull film findings. Of 1,845 patients, seven (0.38%) had basilar fractures requiring antibiotics. These were the only patients whose treatment and outcome were apparently altered by radiographic findings. Skull fractures alone seldom indicate more serious internal head injury. Routine skull films after head trauma are not effective contributors to the evaluation, management, or outcome of acute intracranial injury. "High--yield" clinical criteria are offered for predicting patients at risk for significant intracranial sequelae. If any of the "high-yield" features for significant intracranial sequelae are present, computed tomography should be considered as the primary, noninvasive diagnostic procedure of choice. The poor correlation of skull fracture with significant intracranial sequelae suggests that, for a select subgroup of patients, skull fracture may protect against significant intracranial sequelae.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TraumaHome page
J Benham and S. Chavda
Head trauma
Trauma, April 1, 2004; 6(2): 101 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. J. Homer and L. Kleinman
Technical Report: Minor Head Injury in Children
Pediatrics, December 1, 1999; 104(6): 78e - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
P. A. Taheri, H. Karamanoukian, K. Gibbons, N. Waldman, R. J. Doerr, and E. L. Hoover
Can Patients With Minor Head Injuries Be Safely Discharged Home?
Arch Surg, March 1, 1993; 128(3): 289 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. D. Fihn, E. B. Larson, T. R. Rudd, and W. B. Nelp
Clinical Use of Radionuclide Bone Imaging in a University Medical Center
JAMA, July 23, 1982; 248(4): 439 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.