AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ovenfors, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ovenfors, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 5, 1065-1069
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Optimum radiographic examination for consideration of compensation awards: I. General methodology and application to chest examination

RL Eisenberg, MW Hedgcock, EA Williams, BJ Lyden, Akin JR, GA Gooding, and CO Ovenfors

A major goal of the radiologist is to devise methods to decrease health care costs and radiation exposure without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. In a large Veterans Administration (VA) hospital, a prospective study was undertaken to determine the optimum number of radiographic projections needed to assess applicants for VA compensation for chest disease or injury claimed to be service-related. Three separate readings of every chest radiographic assessment could have been made from a single posteroanterior view. In eight cases, granulomas or mild hyperexpansion of the lungs were only appreciated using the lateral projection, but these findings were not clinically significant and did not affect decisions as to whether compensation sould be awarded. The only potentially serious lesion missed (a possible pulmonary nodule) using the posteroanterior view alone was also missed using the lateral and only suggested by the oblique views. Extrapolating these results to data on compensation examinations performed in the entire VA system (fiscal year 1978), it was concluded that limiting the radiographic examination of the chest to a single posteroanterior view would eliminate 150,000 radiographs in the evaluation of 190,000 applicants and yield an annual savings of almost $900,000.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.