AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenfield, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenfield, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 5, 927-935
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Femoral, popliteal, and tibial arteries: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

AJ Greenfield

We attempted percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 70 patients with obliterative atherosclerosis of the femoral, popliteal, and tibial arteries. Patients with limb threatening ischemia (rest pain, nonhealing ulcer, or gangrene) or lifestyle-limiting claudication were acceptable candidates. Stenoses less than 4 cm long or occlusions less than 10 cm long and less than 2 years old were considered favorable for angioplasty, but less desirable lesions were accepted for limb salvage. Patients with increased surgical risk, inadequate saphenous veins, poor runoff, or in whom temporizing was necessary or desirable, were offered angioplasty for revascularization as an alternative to surgical reconstruction. Technical success was achieved in 62 (88%) of 70 patients with five early failures for an overall initial success rate of 57 (81%) of 70. Complete relief of clinical symptoms was achieved in 53 patients (92%) and 54 had improved lower limb perfusion when measured noninvasively. Patency rate at 1 year was 89% +/- 5% and in 2 years 84% +/- 6% by life table analysis. Major complications occurred in eight (11.4%) of 70 procedures. We conclude that angioplasty of femoral, popliteal, and tibial vessels is an effective and safe alternative to traditional surgical bypass grafting for revascularization of the ischemic lower extremity. Early patency rates are comparable to saphenous vein grafts and considerably better than prosthetic reconstruction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
M. D. Colburn and W. S. Moore
Surgery or Endovascular Surgery for Chronic Lower Extremity Ischemia: What Selection Criteria Should We Use?
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1995; 8(1): 31 - 55.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Troop, G. J. Peterson, and T. Pilla
Treatment of Advanced Vascular Disease with Intra-Arterial Thrombolytic Therapy Followed by Arterial Dilatation
Angiology, August 1, 1983; 34(8): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.