AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goplerud, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goplerud, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 136, Issue 1, 117-122
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: CT diagnosis

JW Walsh, MA Amendola, DJ Hall, J Tisnado, and DR Goplerud

Thirty-three patients with previously treated carcinoma of the cervix were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) for recurrent tumor. Recurrent carcinoma was confirmed in 29 patients and radiation sequelae were documented in four patients. CT diagnosis was true positive for recurrence in 82%, false negative in 6%, false positive in 6%, and equivocal in 6%. False-negative examinations were due to small, superficial, clinically detectable tumor foci in the vagina or perineum. False-positive and equivocal examinations were due to radiation changes in the true pelvis. CT was valuable in assessing central pelvic tumor recurrence, parametrial and sidewall tumor extension, pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenopathy, and the obstruction site of hydronephrosis. Since CT detected recurrent tumor in 27 of 29 patients (sensitivity 93%), it is a valuable noninvasive technique to screen patients with suspected recurrent tumor and to evaluate those with known recurrence for disease extent and subsequent therapy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Y. Jeong, H. K. Kang, T. W. Chung, J. J. Seo, and J. G. Park
Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Therapy: CT and MR Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 969 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kaur, P. M. Silverman, R. B. Iyer, C. F. Verschraegen, P. J. Eifel, and C. Charnsangavej
Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Cervical Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1621 - 1631.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.