AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perez, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perez, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 136, Issue 1, 123-128
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Contribution of CT to quantitative radiation therapy planning

SC Prasad, MV Pilepich, and CA Perez

The contribution of computed tomography (CT) in radiotherapeutic treatment of lung cancer was evaluated. Radiation therapy ports prepared for 50 patients on the basis of routine diagnostic radiographs and without CT scan information were reviewed after CT scanning. Of 50 patients, 13 (26%) required alteration of treatment ports on the basis of the additional CT scan information. In 11 patients (22%) the changes resulted in an increase in field size to cover the tumor adequately, and in two patients (4%-) the field size was reduced to spare normal tissue. A three-phase study was completed to evaluate the impact of CT on quantitative parameters of two-dimensional treatment plans on 25 of the 50 patients. Treatment plans in the absence of CT scan and without lung transmission correction were compared with treatment plans where CT information was used and lung transmission corrections were performed. Numerical results for local efficiency and nonuniformity factor were compared for conventional, CT unoptimized, and CT optimized plans. Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) had poorer local efficiency and 16 (64%) had nonuniformity factor exceeding 5% when treatment was planned without CT information. CT-optimized plans improved local efficiency in 16 (64%) of 25 patients and reduced nonuniformity to within 5% in 21 (84%). It is suggested that in the treatment planning of patients with lung cancer, CT scan information is essential for accurate determination of dose distribution and optimization of therapy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.