AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernardino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernardino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 136, Issue 3, 521-525
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

An initial experience with post-data processing in hepatic sonography

ME Bernardino, JL Thomas, and GB Mayes

Sonographic image manipulation became a possibility with the advent of digital equipment. Depending on the manufacturer, this manipulation may be called pre-data processing, post-data processing, or both. It involves changing the normal assigned gray scale curve to accentuate defined decibel ranges. Sixty consecutive patients were examined who had technically adequate hepatic sonograms using the normal linear gray scale range and post-data processing (PDP). Sonograms were considered normal in 32 patients, while 28 were believed abnormal. In 10 of the 28 abnormal scans, hepatic metastases were better visualized with post-data processing (one false-positive). These were patients in whom there was a minimal echogenic difference between the surrounding normal liver and the lesion. However, in no case was a lesion seen after post-data processing that was not recognizable on the linear gray scale scan. In the other 18 abnormal scans (one false-positive study), the echogenic difference between the lesion and the liver was large enough that PDP was not helpful. The possible pitfalls in the use of PDP, such as poor technique, are discussed and demonstrated. Improvement in hepatic sonographic sensitivity will require more fundamental improvement of equipment than provided by post-data processing.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.