AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knaus, W.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knaus, W.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 136, Issue 3, 537-542
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

CT for headache: cost/benefit for subarachnoid hemorrhage

WA Knaus, DP Wagner, and DO Davis

Nationwide cost and benefit was estimated for performing computed tomography (CT) on headache patients in the hope of discovering a specific finding, subarachnoid hemorrhage. Case finding costs were estimated using a previously published survey of CT use at a university hospital where, of 258 headache patients scanned, two had subarachnoid bleeding due to ruptured aneurysms. The incidence and natural history of ruptured aneurysms from a large-scale clinical trial and the outcome of surgery from the recent literature were used in the calculations. The results ranged from a worst case calculation of $24,713/year and $543,688/person saved (ignoring all other diagnoses) to a best case calculation of $1,999/year and $43,975/person assuming that other positive diagnoses were of equal outcome to ruptured aneurysms. The analysis, using a technique recommended as a model for future determinations of this type, also demonstrated that a most important variable in determining costs is the case finding rate. If there is a need to improve the use of new diagnostic technologies, such as CT, concentration should be on the identification of the characteristics of high-yield patient groups.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. L. Mayer, I. A. Awad, R. Todor, K. Harbaugh, G. Varnavas, T. A. Lansen, P. Dickey, R. Harbaugh, and L. N. Hopkins
Misdiagnosis of Symptomatic Cerebral Aneurysm: Prevalence and Correlation With Outcome at Four Institutions
Stroke, September 1, 1996; 27(9): 1558 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.