AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levenson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Minna, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levenson, R., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Minna, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 137, Issue 1, 31-35
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Small cell lung cancer: radionuclide bone scans for assessment of tumor extent and response

RM Levenson Jr, BJ Sauerbrunn, DC Ihde, PA Bunn Jr, MH Cohen, and JD Minna

Radionuclide bone scans were performed before and during combination chemotherapy in 119 systematically staged patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. Before therapy, 49 patients (41%) had positive scans. Scan positivity was significantly associated with the presence of metastatic tumor in the bone marrow, positive skeletal radiographs, and elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels. Nonosseous distant metastases were significantly more likely to be detected as the number of areas of focal abnormalities on bone scan increased. The survival of patients with documented distant metastases in bone and nonosseous sites was significantly inferior to the survival of patients with limited disease, isolated osseous extensive disease, and extensive disease occurring only in nonbony sites. Of 36 patients with initially abnormal scans and tumor regression documented by other methods, scan findings improved in 24 (67%). In 26 (36%) of 72 scans in patients demonstrating disease progression in extraosseous sites, new areas of increased radionuclide uptake appeared. Improvement or worsening in follow-up scans was associated with nonbony tumor response or progression, respectively, 70% of the time. Serial bone scans provide reasonably accurate staging and prognostic information in patients with small cell lung cancer, although they are probably not sufficiently reliable to be used as the sole parameter in therapeutic decision-making.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.