AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadlock, F.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadlock, F.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 137, Issue 1, 83-85
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD

FP Hadlock, RL Deter, RJ Carpenter, and SK Park

Several recent obstetrical sonographic examinations in this department demonstrated that variations in the shape of the fetal skull (e.g., dolichocephaly, brachycephaly) may adversely affect the accuracy of the biparietal diameter (BPD) measurement in estimating fetal age. In each case the cephalic index of the fetal skull (short axis/long axis x 100) was in either the dolichocephalic or brachycephalic range based on established postnatal criteria. Consequently, normal values were determined (mean, 78.3) for the cephalic index in utero based on 316 obstetrical sonographic studies performed at 14--40 weeks. Preliminary experience indicates that a cephalic index greater than 1 SD from the mean (less than 74, greater than 83) may be associated with a significant alteration in the BPD measurement expected for a given gestational age, and that the head circumference can be used effectively as an alternative means of establishing gestational age.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
A.C. Ugwu, E.O. Ewunonu, I.C. Nwobi, O.C. Egwu, and K.N. Ovuoba
Sonographic Assessment of Fetal Cephalic Index in a Nigerian Population: A Novel Paradigm
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 2007; 23(2): 87 - 90.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
B. Hearn-Stebbins
Normal Fetal Growth Assessment: A Review of Literature and Current Practice
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 1995; 11(4): 176 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
T. J. DuBose
Fetal Biometry: Vertical Calvarial Diameter and Calvarial Volume
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 1985; 1(5): 205 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.