AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarti, D.
Right arrow Articles by Karp, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarti, D.
Right arrow Articles by Karp, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 137, Issue 1, 87-91
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Correlation of biparietal and fetal body diameters: 12--26 weeks gestation

DA Sarti, BF Crandall, J Winter, RD Robertson, NM Kaback, and LE Karp

One hundred thirty-four obstetrical diagnostic sonographic examinations were performed on patients of 12--26 gestational weeks. The following abdominal diameter measurements were obtained: (1) anteroposterior transverse diameter; (2) right-to-left transverse diameter; (3) average of (1) and (2); and (4) greatest longitudinal diameter. These measurements were plotted against the respective biparietal diameters, and normal statistical distribution curves were developed. These curves have proven helpful in cases with a questionable disproportionate relation between the fetal head and body size in early pregnancy. The data have facilitated identification of fetal abnormalities sufficiently early in the pregnancies to permit advising therapeutic abortion. Five cases outside the normal range are discussed and compared to normal. In several cases, the sonographic results played a major role in the decision-making process of the patient involved.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.