AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelfand, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ott, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelfand, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ott, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 137, Issue 3, 523-528
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society

Articles

Single- vs. double-contrast gastrointestinal studies: critical analysis of reported statistics

DW Gelfand and DJ Ott

A literature review of Western publications for the reported sensitivities of single- and double-contrast gastrointestinal examinations indications that certain claims of superiority for the double-contrast technique may be optimistically misleading. Analysis of reports on detection of four entities-gastric cancer, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and colonic polyps-suggests superiority for the double-contrast barium enema for detection of colonic polyps. However, no advantage for single- or double contrast examinations was demonstrable for the detection of gastric cancer, gastric ulcer, or duodenal ulcer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. C. Fiedorek, R. J. Shulman, and W. J. Klish
Endoscopic Detection of Peptic Ulcer Disease in Cystic Fibrosis
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 1986; 25(5): 243 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.