AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Littleton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Durizch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Littleton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Durizch, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 137, Issue 4, 835-845
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Temporal bone: comparison of pluridirectional tomography and high resolution computed tomography

JT Littleton, KA Shaffer, WP Callahan, and ML Durizch

The recent introduction of high resolution computed tomography (CT) capable of resolving delicate bony structures such as the temporal bone marks another significant advance in diagnostic imaging. This study was designed to compare the integrity of these new CT images, standard CT images, and conventional complex motion tomographic images against contact radiographs of sliced anatomic specimens. Temporal bones of three frozen cadaver heads were studied with complex motion tomograms at 1 mm intervals and contiguous CT scans at 1.5 mm intervals in axial, coronal, and sagittal projections. The heads were physically sectioned at 2 mm intervals in planes corresponding to the radiographic planes using a precise indexing and sawing system. The tomographic images were compared for information content to contact radiographs of the anatomic specimen sections. Conventional tomographic images and expanded number range target reconstruction CT images proved to be highly accurate. Standard CT reconstruction images were not. The probable clinical effectiveness of each method is discussed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.