AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Leary, D.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Leary, D.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 138, Issue 1, 109-111
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Noninvasive testing for carotid artery stenosis: II. Clinical application of accuracy assessments

DH O'Leary, ME Clouse, AV Persson, and SA Edwards

Determination of the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of diagnostic tests usually identifies the value of the tests in isolation, but the clinical significance of the findings is less clear. In this study the accuracies of direct continuous wave color-coded Doppler imaging (DDI), periorbital directional Doppler ultrasonography (PDDU), and oculoplethysmography-carotid phonangiography (OPG-CPA) were calculated for each examination alone and in combination with others for 176 patients who had been studied by all three noninvasive methods for suspected extracranial carotid arterial disease. When evaluated alone, DDI yielded the highest accuracy, 94%. In 89% of the population, DDI agreed with at least one of the other two tests. When this occurred, the majority finding was correct 98%. When DDI disagreed with the other two tests (11% of cases), it was correct in only 50%. These findings suggest a clinical approach which would minimize testing while achieving a high accuracy for most patients and identifying those patients whose carotid status could not be discerned with these studies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.