AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Salane, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Salane, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 138, Issue 1, 113-118
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Breast parenchymal patterns: analysis of 332 incident breast carcinomas

JN Wolfe, S Albert, S Belle, and M Salane

A detailed analysis of 332 incident breast carcinomas is presented. The study results indicate that there is validity to the breast parenchymal patterns as an indication of risk for developing breast cancer and that risk is independent of length of follow-up and age of patient. All cases were drawn from a referral-type practice at Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, MI. The cases were compared to controls for computation of relative risk up to and beyond a follow-up period of 48 months. They were also compared to a consecutive series of prevalent breast carcinomas seen at Hutzel Hospital during the 6 years 1975-1980. The extent of disease in the cases described in this report is somewhat more favorable than in a consecutive series of prevalent cancers operated on a Hutzel Hospital. Most breast cancers occur in the P2 breast, a smaller number in the DY, and only 12% in the combined N1P1 type. The conclusions of other investigators regarding parenchymal patterns as risk indicators are reviewed. Particular attention was paid to comparing the length of follow-up and age of patient. There was no diminution of proportions of cases in the P2/N1-P1 or DY/N1-P1 after a 48 month follow-up. There was a significant diminution in the proportion of cases falling into DY/N1-P1 after age 50, and less so in P2/N1-P1. Furthermore, relative risk was unaffected by time or age.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.