AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brasch, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cann, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brasch, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cann, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 138, Issue 1, 127-133
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Computed tomographic scanning in children: II. An updated comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial scanners

RC Brasch and CE Cann

Surface and internal radiation doses for abdominal CT of children were determined using child-sized phantoms and seven commercial models of CT body scanners. High contrast resolving power and low contrast discrimination for each scanner were determined simultaneously with radiation dose measurements and the results were compared with those from a similar study conducted in 1977 with earlier CT models. The average circumferential surface doses for simulated pediatric CT body examinations were 31% lower in this study compared to 1977 results, with a mean of 1.5 rad (0.015 Gy) vs. 2.2 rad (0.022 Gy) respectively. At the same time, resolving power for high (12%) contrast improved by 31% to a mean of 1.38 mm from 2.00 mm. All scanners in the present study could resolve low contrast differences of 1/4% for a 5 mm object.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
V. Guzzanti, A. Gigante, A. Di Lazzaro, and C. Fabbriciani
Patellofemoral Malalignment in Adolescents: Computerized Tomographic Assessment with or without Quadriceps Contraction
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1994; 22(1): 55 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.