AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornbury,
Right arrow Articles by Fryback, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornbury, , JR
Right arrow Articles by Fryback, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 138, Issue 1, 43-49
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Hypertensive urogram: a nondiscriminatory test for renovascular hypertension

Thornbury JR, JC Stanley, and DG Fryback

Evidence has accumulated from clinical experience that the hypertensive urogram is not a satisfactory screening test for differentiating hypertension due to renal artery stenosis from essential hypertension. This is contrary to the conclusion reached in the report of the Cooperative Study published in 1972. The present investigation was done to: (1) reassess the value of the hypertensive urogram on the basis of experience at a single institution and (2) to reassess the validity of the Cooperative Study conclusions. In 197 patients operated on at the University of Michigan for renal artery stenosis during 1961-1977, the true-positive rate for hypertensive urography for prediction of surgical cure or improvement was 60.2%. In 131 patients undergoing hypertensive urography in 1977, the incidence of positive examinations in screening was 0.8%. The chance for a favorable surgical outcome in hypertensive patients having positive hypertensive urograms is now calculated as 24%, rather than 50% as stated in the Cooperative Study. Reanalysis of the Cooperative Study data also shows that the false-negative rate for screening is at least 21.8%, rather than 1.7%. A screening strategy fo choosing patients for renal arteriography and surgery on the basis of clinical factors and excluding urography is presented.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. De Cobelli, M. Venturini, A. Vanzulli, S. Sironi, M. Salvioni, E. Angeli, P. Scifo, M. P. Garancini, R. Quartagno, G. Bianchi, et al.
Renal Arterial Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of Color Doppler US and Breath-hold, Three-dimensional, Dynamic, Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 373 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. Kim, D. H. Porter, R. Brown, M. S. Crivello, P. Silva, and B. W.A. Leeming
Renal Artery Imaging: A Prospective Comparison of Intra-Arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography with Conventional Angiography
Angiology, May 1, 1991; 42(5): 345 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.