AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, F.
Right arrow Articles by Gilderdale, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, F.
Right arrow Articles by Gilderdale, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 138, Issue 2, 193-200
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: initial experience

FH Doyle, JM Pennock, LM Banks, MJ McDonnell, GM Bydder, RE Steiner, IR Young, GJ Clarke, T Pasmore, and DJ Gilderdale

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) scans of the liver were obtained in 12 normal volunteers and 32 patients using a whole-body machine developed by Thorn-EMI Ltd., and the results were compared with x-ray computed tomography (CT). Two types of NMR scan, saturation-recovery and inversion-recovery, were performed in order to obtain values for the spin-lattice relaxation time, T1. Although the saturation-recovery scans show little soft-tissue detail, the inversion-recovery scans demonstrated the interlobar fissure, hepatic veins, portal veins, bile ducts, and gallbladder. In comparison with CT (Siemens Somatom 2), both types of NMR scan showed some blurring due to respiratory movement but much less linear artifact across the liver from the air-fluid interface in the stomach. Focal disease within the liver was demonstrated by both CT and NMR, although an area of focal atrophy and another of hepatic infarction were only recognized with NMR. In diffuse disease the pattern varied. In steatosis CT was virtually diagnostic, while NMR showed no specific features. In hemochromatosis, hepatitis, eight cases of cirrhosis, and one of Wilson disease, both techniques showed abnormalities of varying specificity. In two cases of cirrhosis and one of primary biliary cirrhosis, only the NMR scan was abnormal. Nuclear magnetic resonance images are now sufficiently anatomically detailed to permit serious comparisons with technically advanced computed tomography. The information revealed is fundamentally different and can be expected to have some diagnostic utility.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Hirohashi, K. Ueda, H. Uchida, W. Ono, J. Takahama, M. Takewa, S. Kitano, and H. Ohishi
Nondiffuse Fatty Change of the Liver: Discerning Pseudotumor on MR Images Enhanced with Ferumoxides-Initial Observations
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 415 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Budinger and P. Lauterbur
Nuclear magnetic resonance technology for medical studies
Science, October 19, 1984; 226(4672): 288 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.