AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mack, L.
Right arrow Articles by Winquist, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mack, L.
Right arrow Articles by Winquist, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 138, Issue 3, 407-412
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

CT of acetabular fractures: analysis of fracture patterns

LA Mack, JD Harley, and RA Winquist

Thirty-one consecutive patients who sustained acetabular fracture or posterior femoral head dislocations were examined by computed tomography (CT). By analysis of closely spaced, thin CT images, it was possible to characterize the three-dimensional nature of these injuries. Traditional classification into anterior column, posterior column, and complex two-column fractures was facilitated. CT was especially useful in evaluation of the two-column fractures in which unique information concerning the configuration of the fracture, integrity of the acetabular dome and quadrilateral surface, and identification of the stable fragment was obtained. Surprisingly constant fracture patterns were identified. CT was also useful in determination of presence or absence of loose bodies in the joint and in evaluation of the femoral head and sacroiliac joint in all types of fracture.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Ohashi, G. Y. El-Khoury, K. W. Abu-Zahra, and K. S. Berbaum
Interobserver Agreement for Letournel Acetabular Fracture Classification with Multidetector CT: Are Standard Judet Radiographs Necessary?
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 386 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Harris Jr., K. J. Coupe, J. S. Lee, and T. Trotscher
Acetabular Fractures Revisited: Part 2, A New CT-Based Classification
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1367 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, F. J. Dorey, and J. M. Matta
Letournel Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Assessment of Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2003; 85(9): 1704 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.