AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freeny, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marks, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freeny, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marks, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 138, Issue 6, 1077-1084
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: barium and CT examination

PC Freeny and WM Marks

Seventy-seven patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction were evaluated with upper gastrointestinal barium studies (single-contrast, 40: double-contrast, 37) and 21 of these had preoperative computed tomography for staging. Single- and double-contrast studies were equally sensitive in detecting exophytic tumors, but double-contrast studies were slightly more sensitive (25 of 26) than single-contrast examinations (21 of 25) in detecting infiltrating tumors. Computed tomography accurately staged 18 (86%) of 21 cases (16 unresectable, two resectable). The most reliable computed tomographic findings of tumor unresectability were metastases (liver, adrenal) and local tumor extension, both found in 10 (48%) of 21 cases, and regional adenopathy, present in eight (38%) of 21 cases. The presence or absence of the periesophageal soft-tissue planes was an unreliable finding and led to both false-positive (two cases) and false-negative (four cases) diagnoses. CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy was used successfully in four cases to obtain a cytologic diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. E. Rubesin, M. S. Levine, and I. Laufer
Double-Contrast Upper Gastrointestinal Radiography: A Pattern Approach for Diseases of the Stomach
Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 33 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.