AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bydder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bydder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 139, Issue 2, 215-236
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases

GM Bydder, RE Steiner, IR Young, AS Hall, DJ Thomas, J Marshall, CA Pallis, and NJ Legg

Cranial nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) scans were performed on 13 healthy volunteers and 140 patients with a broad spectrum of neurologic disease and compared with x-ray computed tomography (CT) scans. The NMR scans included a variety of sequences reflecting proton density, blood flow, T1, and T2 as well as transverse, sagittal, and coronal images. White matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid were clearly distinguished in the normal brain with inversion-recovery (IR) sequences, and normal progressive myelination was demonstrated in infants and children. Acute hemorrhages displayed short T1 values, but other pathologic processes such as infarction, infection, demyelination, edema, and malignancy were associated with long T1 values. Cysts had very long T1 values (about that of cerebrospinal fluid). Spin-echo (SE) sequences showed increased values of T2 in a variety of conditions and highlighted lesions against the relatively featureless background of the remaining brain. With inversion-recovery scans, different stages of infarction were recognized in the hemispheres. NMR was more useful than CT in demonstrating brainstem infarction. The white matter lesions in demyelinating diseases were well demonstrated with NMR scans. Many more lesions were observed in multiple sclerosis with NMR than with CT. Benign tumors were well seen and usually had shorter T1 values than malignant tumors. Mass effects from tumors were generally better demonstrated with NMR than with CT, including more subtle mass effects such as displacement of the external capsule. Abnormalities were seen in diseases of the basal ganglia, including marked atrophy of the head of the caudate nucleus in Huntington chorea. Advantages of NMR imaging include the high level of gray-white matter contrast, lack of bone artifact, variety of possible sequences, transverse, sagittal, and coronal imaging, sensitivity to pathologic change, and lack of known hazard. Disadvantages include lack of bone detail, limited spatial resolution, lack of contrast agents, and cost. Promising directions for future clinical research include developmental neurology, tissue characterization with T1 and T2, assessment of blood flow, and the development of contrast agents. Much more detailed evaluation will be required, but NMR seems to be a potentially important addition to existing techniques of neurologic diagnosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. T. Bui-Mansfield
Whatever Happened to the 50 Most Frequently Cited Articles Published in AJR?
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 597 - 601.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
B. Meissner, K. Kohler, K. Kortner, M. Bartl, U. Jastrow, B. Mollenhauer, A. Schroter, M. Finkenstaedt, O. Windl, S. Poser, et al.
Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical findings
Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 450 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Law, S. Yang, H. Wang, J. S. Babb, G. Johnson, S. Cha, E. A. Knopp, and D. Zagzag
Glioma Grading: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of Perfusion MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging Compared with Conventional MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 1989 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Tullberg, C. Jensen, S. Ekholm, and C. Wikkelso
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Vascular White Matter Changes on MR Images Must Not Exclude Patients from Shunt Surgery
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2001; 22(9): 1665 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. Matsuoka, M. Hamada, T. Honda, H. Kawakami, H. Okayama, M. Abe, Y. Shigematsu, T. Sumimoto, and K. Hiwada
Precise Assessment of Myocardial Damage Associated with Secondary Cardiomyopathies by Use of Gd-DTPA-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Angiology, December 1, 1993; 44(12): 945 - 950.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
E. S. Roach, T. Smith, C. V. Terry, A. R. Riela, and D. W. Laster
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Neurologic Disorders
J Child Neurol, April 1, 1987; 2(2): 111 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. R. Mandelbaum, G. A.M. Finerman, M. A. Reicher, S. Hartzman, L. W. Bassett, R. H. Gold, W. Rauschning, and F. Dorey
Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for evaluation of traumatic knee injuries: Anatomical and pathoanatomical correlations
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1986; 14(5): 361 - 370.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.