AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sones, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sones, P., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, J., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 139, Issue 3, 469-475
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Effectiveness of CT in evaluating intrathoracic masses

PJ Sones Jr, WE Torres, RS Colvin, WL Meier, P Sprawls, and JV Rogers Jr

To compare the effectiveness of computed tomography (CT) with conventional radiography and conventional tomography for evaluating masses in the thorax, 168 masses, 154 of which were histologically verified, which had been examined with CT were reviewed. In 74 instances (44%) CT provided important additional information compared with conventional radiography. Compared to conventional tomography, CT added important information in 15 (23%) of 65 cases. In no case did CT fail to demonstrate pathology shown with the other two methods. Average radiation dose to the chest was 1.3 rad (0.013 Gy) with CT and 0.4 rad (0.004 Gy) with linear tomography. Although CT is associated with slightly greater radiation dose and cost, this review indicates it should be performed directly after plain film examination instead of conventional tomography when further investigation of an intrathoracic mass is indicated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.