AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goplerud, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goplerud, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 139, Issue 6, 1149-1154
Copyright © 1982 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Computed tomography of primary, persistent, and recurrent endometrial malignancy

JW Walsh and DR Goplerud

For 45 months, 24 patients with primary endometrial malignancy, 12 patients with suspected persistent tumor, and 29 patients with suspected recurrent tumor were evaluated with computed tomography (CT). In staging primary tumors, CT could not differentiate stage IA, IB, and II lesions and showed extrauterine tumor in only one (7%) of 15 clinical stage I--II tumours. CT was valuable in clinical stage III tumors by showing both parametrial extension and extrapelvic metastases. CT-surgical stage comparison showed an 83% accuracy in showing tumor confined to the uterus and an 86% accuracy in showing extrauterine tumor spread. CT did not detect microscopic pelvic node metastases or microscopic bladder involvement. In persistent and recurrent tumors, CT was sensitive in detecting both pelvic tumor and lymphatic, peritoneal, and mesenteric metastases. These data were supplemental to clinical assessment in choosing among surgical, radiation, or chemotherapy treatment. Vaginal recurrences were best evaluated by clinical examination and cytology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.